Found and Filed

socialistexan:

This great except for the sexual orientation.

It got so close, but using Bisexual instead of Pan and not including Asexual bothers me.

The problem is sexuality on a linear continuum works asthetically, but not in reality. Wouldn’t pansexual basically *be* the entire line? Where would asexual be? We need a ball of wibbly-wobbly sexy-wexy stuff. With the same little explanation under it that all the other stuff got. My favored summary is: Gender- what’s in your head, Sex- what you have between your legs, Sexuality- who you want between your legs. Though that one sort of disregards expression, though. Hmmm… No such thing as a perfect analogy because none of us are perfect? Possibly the best thing to do is be as open minded as possible and then ackknowledge that you’re probably missing someone/getting it wrong somehow.